View Single Post
Old 02-01-2014, 12:17 PM   #298
RogerWilco
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar View Post
If understand how the Italian court works (or doesn't work as the case may be), the retrial was not a true retrial in that evidence from the first trial can be considered.

Anyway, their blood was found mixed together in the bathroom, for sure, and there was expert disagreement as to whether mixed blood was found in the room where the murder took place.

Amanda told the police she had thoroughly cleaned the bathroom the day before the murder.

Also, on the footsteps, a lot of you are picking a side. There was testimony that the bloody footsteps were consistent with Knox. And I have no idea where you all say the evidence shows there was only one attacker, that's what a website argues but the evidence itself could be argued the other way, and was.
This really isn't rocket science, just a little common sense some time prevails. The foot prints were Knox's for sure, but they were not blood.

The The Luminol Lies

http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/FBI6.html
RogerWilco is offline   Reply With Quote