View Single Post
Old 02-01-2014, 11:28 AM   #291
Kjesse
Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nage Waza View Post
Knox does not have to provide an explanation why her DNA is on a knife, but I would guess it is because she claims they made meals together at his place?

Why would anyone care her DNA was on a knife they used for cooking at her boyfriends?

You brought up a knife that was not used in the crime and was taken from a kitchen in another location, along with many other knives.
Repeating nonsense does not make it true.
You're making things up now. There was no evidence about them cooking together, and there was some evidence to suggest they never had as they had just recently met. I don't see much point in debating this with you. Also, just picking one expert at a trial and suggesting that conclusion is fact and ignoring the other experts who said the opposite only shows you're going to go with whatever evidence supports your belief. You are only talking about the Knox experts and are ignoring the government's experts.

Last edited by Kjesse; 02-01-2014 at 11:31 AM.
Kjesse is offline   Reply With Quote