She first claimed to not be at the apartment the night Meredith was murdered, but then changed the story to directly accuse an innocent man of murdering the coed.
No, she did not do this. The police messed with her and coerced her to say what they wanted. She never wanted to accuse anyone since she knew nothing.
She was reportedly spotted at a store in the early morning hours before the police were alerted to Meredith's body -- accused of buying bleach.
This was a hoax.
She reportedly showered in the apartment after discovering an unsettling amount of blood, before police were aware of Meredith's body. It's odd that this would be her first action after noticing an apparent break in and potential crime, isn't it?
Was there blood in the bathroom? A significant amount? Where did you get the term 'unsettling' from? Let's see...if she committed murder, what should she have done? Left town? Not called the cops? Let one person in their murderous group leave town so she can blame her boyfriend? She did not of the above. She thought something was amiss and they called the cops.
Amanda appeared to stage her "attempt" at contacting Meredith by calling her English phone, knowing that she used her other phone in Italy. After she is told to try contacting the woman (when telling their other roommate about the blood and apparent "break in") She finally calls both phones, but neither calls last even long enough to listen to Meredith's voicemail.
Not sure how silly someone must be to think this equals murderer.
Both Amanda and Raffaele couldn't get their stories to match up during the investigation.
What she said would not be admissible in any court in Canada, because it was coerced, and violently.
Amanda lied to police and told them that Meredith always kept her door locked -- when it was the contrary.
Yah, big lie. She thought her door was locked.
Raffaele Sollecito knew that nothing had been stolen from Meredith's bedroom before police were even able to enter it.
More lies.
Amanda knew details behind Meredith's murder (such as where some of the wounds on her body were) and shared them with friends, even though the details hadn't been released and Meredith's body was found covered with a blanket.
More lies. The police fed her everything she knew.
A homeless man saw Amanda and Raff in a "heated argument" at the flat where Meredith's body was found at around 11:00 p.m., the night she was reportedly murdered.
Homeless junky that turned out to be confused and proved he knew nothing. Why would you even think of bringing this guy up? Even the judge, as incompetent as he was asked the police to get the guy out of the court room. And you are using his words? What you read is a lie.
A knife was found in Raff's possession with Meredith Kercher's DNA on one end (the blade) and Knox's DNA on the handle. The knife was scrubbed with bleach and had only trace amounts of DNA.
The knife was not part of the crime. There was one knife used, period, and this was not it. It was simply a knife. In fact, the police went into the apartment and only grabbed that knife. Your evidence is very silly. Consider this: They never found a scratch or blood or any damaged clothes from the two, yet they brought the knife home? And put it in their kitchen? You provide these outlandish ideas of the cover up, and they brought the murder weapon home?
There is an absence of evidence that would be unexplaineable if the two were part of the murder. In fact, there is more evidence from the murderer himself when he claimed they had nothing to do with it.
Answer this: How could they have assisted in the murder if there was only evidence in the room of one person?
How could the footprints of two other people magically disappear?
How could the prosecution do such a good job of including no evidence? Even by accident they would have found something. They found nothing, no DNA, no finger prints, nothing.
|