View Single Post
Old 01-31-2014, 08:04 PM   #272
Nage Waza
Offered up a bag of cans for a custom user title
 
Nage Waza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Westside
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oilyfan View Post
And your explanation of Meredith having multiple knife wounds, cuts, bruises, contusions, 43 by one count, without any defensive wounds? This screams multiple attackers.
This is very silly. The crime scene had evidence of one attacker, including DNA evidence and footprints. There was no evidence at all of a second attacker. The person whose DNA was found at the scene? Guede. He even confessed.

There was evidence of an attacker with footprints everywhere in blood. Not two people, or three, just one. That in itself is evidence of one attacker.

Are you now suggesting that the other multiple attackers watched from outside the room? That the attackers turned on each other (and her boss like you suggest) but never turned on some homeless guy?

Yet you also say that something 'screams multiple attackers'? How is this possible when the evidence proved otherwise? Even Guede had cuts on his hands, as always happens in these types of attacks. Yet the two innocent people had no cuts, no marks, nothing. Where are the other multiple attackers? They don't exist.

In fact, they would have had blood on their clothes and blood on their feet if they were involved, yet they only found Guede's footprints outside the room. No one else, period.

Here are the facts, taken from a great website:

http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/FBI2.html

1. There is absolutely no evidence of Amanda Knox in the room at the time of the murder, nor is there evidence that she participated in any way. There was no motive. Originally, they claimed that Amanda caught a burglar in their house and decided to murder her roommate with the burglar. It is simply stupid.

a. No blood
b. No hairs
c. No fingerprints
d. No footprints
e. No saliva
f. No DNA

The best part of this which seems confusing for you, the prosecution never explained why there was no evidence and why it was absent. They just lied and created stories, and for some reason, that type of evidence was allowed. Every post you have made was a lie by the prosecution. Your assertion that something 'screams multiple attackers' is a great example of you posting based on your perception, which stands for nothing, nor should it ever. This case is a classic example of what can go wrong in a county without justice.
Nage Waza is offline   Reply With Quote