Quote:
Originally Posted by oilyfan
Roger - I am not going to argue with you, it seems your mind is made up.
I have done my own research, admittedly probably not as through as yours, and I seriously question Steve Moore's motives. This guy is a former FBI agent yes, but he has had as much access to physical evidence and testimony as you and I. Yet he is unequivocal in his belief about the innocence of Amanda. Beyond that he has had no problem mudslinging anyone and everyone connected to the case. He has written a book about this, given numerous TVand print interviews, got himself fired from Pepperdine University for speaking about this case, and now definitely has something to gain from his theory. He has now staked such an extreme position that I cannot see him ever admitting anything he has said was in error.
What I read about the guilt of Amanda makes sense, she was untruthful from the start about her involvement in this case, she falsely accused her boss of the murder and has no trouble changing her story to fit any theory that suits her. She is unreliable and from what I can see guilty.
|
She did not falsely accuse her boss either, this is more lies. They gave her the story and attacked her with it over and over until she was exhausted and said it was plausible. In Canada, under those circumstances, the entire stack of information would be in the garbage.
Amanda was truthful - she knew nothing. She was told that her boyfriend did it and confessed, along with her boss. The police created the story, Amanda's comments reflect the point that not only did she not do it, she doesn't remember doing it, and is amazed that two other people said she did it (or was there when it happened). The two witnesses to her doing it were simply a ruse by the police.
I also love how you say he has an extreme position - he has gone through the evidence and proven that it was a lie, it was botched or was a fable. There really is not another way to look at it.
Additionally, Amanada's so called statement, was taken in the period immediately after her exhausting and violent interrogation. The interrogation was recorded, the computers magically broke losing all the data (I think I am remembering that correctly).