Quote:
Originally Posted by oilyfan
Roger - I am not going to argue with you, it seems your mind is made up.
I have done my own research, admittedly probably not as through as yours, and I seriously question Steve Moore's motives. This guy is a former FBI agent yes, but he has had as much access to physical evidence and testimony as you and I. Yet he is unequivocal in his belief about the innocence of Amanda. Beyond that he has had no problem mudslinging anyone and everyone connected to the case. He has written a book about this, given numerous TVand print interviews, got himself fired from Pepperdine University for speaking about this case, and now definitely has something to gain from his theory. He has now staked such an extreme position that I cannot see him ever admitting anything he has said was in error.
What I read about the guilt of Amanda makes sense, she was untruthful from the start about her involvement in this case, she falsely accused her boss of the murder and has no trouble changing her story to fit any theory that suits her. She is unreliable and from what I can see guilty.
|
I'm pretty sure we will never agree, which is fine since in the end neither of us can do anything about it.
But I disagree with you about Steve Moore. Any person that has knowledge and sees a great injustice should be obligated to speak out.
You also need physical evidence to be guilty of a crime. In this case there simply was none. But let's not get science in the way of a good old fashioned lynching.