Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
Either they're getting along or they're not. I don't think anyone can rationally argue that pulling out of Iraq is a reasonable option for the US at this point. In my opinion, they're now committed to staying the course and keeping order while democracy is established, regardless of the cost.
That doesn't mean that it isn't worth re-evaluating the decision to go to war in the first place--which it's worth remembering was made because of WMDs, not regime change--and which has clearly proven far more costly than anyone thought, both monetarily and in terms of human life. And I don't think even Amir Taheri would deny that.
|
Thanks for biting.
I really don't have any disagreements. Sure one could argue that the war is not justified but it would be an absolute hell to pull out the troops for that reason. The US is there, and must seek the best course at which to succede.
I did notice what you quoted and kinda figured someone would see it. Its common news that the major political parties in Iraq cannot get along. Would I say the disagreements will eventually lead to civil war? No, because the US still has too much of an iron grip on what happens.
I do think Iraq can become sucessful by the end of 2007. But I guess I might be the local optimist who actually wants the US to suceed, instead of hoping they get their asses kicked all the way back to the US. Maybe thats the effect one gets from having family members serving there.
I also think this war and the backlash too it will create a big change in how wars are fought. Notice how the US is holding off against Iran and letting the UN and others also step in? A positive sign IMO.