Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
How can you put the 2013 draft ahead of the 2011 draft, ignore what Burke said?
We selected Monahan with a high draft pick. It was an obvious pick and you can give credit to no one for it.
Poirier I like, but he won't be playing in the NHL for at least 2 and probably more seasons.
Klimchuk will return to junior next year, but will probably take even longer than Poirier to break into he NHL. He's also small, so you just can't like that.
Kanzig is the pick I hate the most. Just awful. If he ever makes it to the NHL, he would be among the lowest scoring junior players in NHL history. I don't think he's the player that'll set that record.
Roy is fine for a 5th round pick but he's just so awful in his own zone that his ceiling is probably being very generous.
Harrison has 4 assists in 22 college games, has often been a healthy scratch. But he's big. Gotta like that.
Rafikov again is fine for his draft position, but he's never going to come over to North America. I will never be a fan of Russian draft picks.
So yeah, instead of me defending my claim all the time, how about you guys tell me why the 2013 draft is better than the 2011 draft?
|
I find it absolutely hilarious that you think you can compare the 2011 and 2013 draft as we head into February of 2014. What's CP without some good ole Ashasx drama though.