Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Having slept on it, I am not happy with this signing.
I am fully in the we-need-vets camp, and I don't have an irrational hate for Stajan like some.
But I can't get past the term. It's just too much commitment to a guy who's game doesn't do anything for me.
Yes, he plays well defensively and he has a role. All fine.
Just not 4 years fine.
I know he can be traded before the 4 years are up - and likely will be. I just don't want to have to sit around, hoping for a trade.
If it were 2 years, or even 3, I would have no problem with it.
|
Explain why a four year term is bad. Beyond thinking that it's "too long."
How would it negatively impact the team?