View Single Post
Old 01-16-2014, 10:00 AM   #13
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

A couple articles from the end of last year on this subject possibly showing the beginning of the end of this bubble:

Quote:
But what the Astros were scheduled to be paid for the broadcast rights to their games differs significantly from what they received. Forbes reported that the CSN Houston deal called for the Astros to be paid $56 million this year, but the network paid only $25 million because it didn’t have the revenue to meet its obligations.


There are several factors contributing to CSN Houston’s bleak financial situation, but biggest is the network’s inability to reach agreement on carriage fees with the non-Comcast cable and satellite operators in the viewing area. AT&T-Uverse, Time Warner Cable and DISH Network have, thus far, refused to pay the $3.40 per-subscriber-per-month fee that CSN Houston demanded to carry the network. As I wrote in July, cable and satellite companies are using more sophisticated rating data to determine who is and who isn’t watching local sports. AT&T-Uverse decided against carrying CSN Houston based on this new, detailed ratings information. Overall, 60% of the homes in the viewing area don’t have CSN Houston.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/astro...-and-lawsuits/

Quote:
Will 2014 be the year when distributors make a serious effort to slow their rising sports costs? It’s possible, especially in dealings with regional sports channels — particularly time-warner-cable-logo__130821213653-275x126in Los Angeles. Time Warner Cable is about to introduce a service for Dodgers games, SportsNetLA, following its launch last year of SportsNet and Deportes which show Lakers games. The cable company is said to want other distributors to pay $5 per subscriber per month for the Dodgers, roughly the same price MSG charges for its regional service that offers the New York Knicks and Rangers. But so far other distributors have not stepped up to the plate. DirecTV could help everyone hold out; the No. 1 satellite company has led the charge against high-priced regional sports networks. It declined to carry the Pac-12 Network which is home to two schools (UCLA and USC) in the key LA market, the University of Texas’ Longhorn Network, and Comcast-owned sports services in Portland, Philadelphia and Houston. (The Houston network filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in September.)
http://www.deadline.com/2013/12/cabl...appen-in-2014/
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote