Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
Let me first say, sincerely, that I appreciate your elevating the level of debate. Disagreement is healthy, and although I sense that you and I disagree about a great many things, I don't see that as a reason that we can't otherwise enjoy a good discussion. (I'm not saying I'm innocent either. Sometimes the anonymity of a message board leads to a little less circumspection. I'll try to mind my p's and q's a bit more in the future.)
I'm looking at the site you linked, and I'm having a little trouble tracking down who the author/site owner is. If you've been there longer, can you help me out? It looks like it was last updated in 1998, so the information may be old--though I'll be the first to admit that this doesn't make it wrong, and I lack the expertise to judge that.
But I do think that the source is important information to have. I may just be looking in the wrong places, but I can't figure it out.
|
Hey, one of my very best friends is an NDP supporter.
I have no idea what the person who created the site, credentials are, but his references surprised even me.
Going through the site and one thing hit me most was how politics is influencing science. That's not good for anyone. What I will say is that if they continue with decreasing CO2 emissions it will also decrease toxic emissions as well and will help protect forests, so even if it is wrong, it will help the things that I am concerned about. I would prefer if we were more focused on those things then worrying about CO2 all the time though.
cheers