Quote:
Originally Posted by Fozzie_DeBear
Africa says Hi
|
Here are some that cannot reply "hi" back as they were disarmed and could not defend themselves...
The Armenians from the Ottoman empire (Turkey),
Ukrainian farmers under Stalan,
Chinese under Mao,
Jewish under Hitler,
Cambodians under Paul Pot,
Ugandans under Idi Amin,
Tutsi in Rwanda,
Mayan Indians in Guatemala,
Buddhist monks in Tibet...
The list goes on...
10's of millions...
Quote:
Originally Posted by jofillips
shawnski read some more history and you just can't believe in those views - more guns means the extreme groups who impose on others basically get their way...
Either way normal, innocent people get told what to do at the end of a barrel...
|
Please, do not patronize me by telling me to read history. I have almost a half century under my belt. Gun controls take away from self defense. Period. Governments, by nature, rule by force and the threat of violence, including "at the end of a barrel".
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
That vote changes if the lamb is armed, no?
And to bring this back to N Korea, they have already succumbed to the tyranny of government without ability to defend themselves.
Look now south of the border. There is a full court press to disarm the populace. This is a huge warning signal. No country would be crazy enough to try to invade the US due to the sheer number of privately owned weapons, so any attack on their ability to defend themselves from "foreign or domestic" foes would weaken them on two fronts significantly.
The most recent attack on the US was obviously 9/11.
Don't go at Saudi Arabia for their majority of nationals involved.. go after Iraq based on absolute BS information. And this was supposedly done with boxcutters....
/weapons grade facepalm