I am at a loss for words as to how to properly respond here.
http://www.thehockeynews.com/article...NHL-draft.html
At least 30 NHL scouts employed by all 30 teams disagree with you.
Now, you really believe that Jankowski is absolute last in EVERY ASPECT OF HIS GAME as compared to his peers in the 1st round? Let me copy and paste your exact words again:
not a single aspect of his game is at the level of what an NHL projected player should be at or what his peers from the first round are at.
Am I interpreting this correctly? You think he is absolutely LAST in EVERY ASPECT of his game from all the players chosen in the first round that year? Can you clarify this if I am misunderstanding your post?
There are players routinely drafted from the lower rounds that have certain aspects higher than almost any first round pick - but they usually have bigger, more glaring or more numerous holes which put them in the later rounds (Gaudreau was said to have had top 3 skills, but his size issues were a huge hole, Kabanov was thought to have had top 5 pick skills, but his perceived attitude issues pushed him down, etc., Heck, Keegan Kanzig probably ranked in the top 5 at least in terms of 'physicality').
However, you insist that Jankowski is absolutely the worst in every aspect of his game chosen from the first round? Difficult to take your posts seriously when you exaggerate like this.