Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2
Hagman was a solid one dimensional scorer. If you guys are hoping he turns into that then that's sad. 301 points in 770 games does not make up for the type of player he is. There is a reason a 33 year old Hagman couldn't find a job in the NHL. If Granlund develops into Hagman I'd rather he not develop at all.
|
I dont disagree entirely, but Hagman was one solid MOFO in his hayday (full on BEAST in Dallas). Just because he sucked in CGY means squat.
That being said, I'll bet both Granlund brothers have a better career that good old Hagman.