ah yes, that's right, i forgot.
saying that the US government may have had involvement in ONE event automatically makes people believe in the illuminati running the world, or the Zionist Overlord Government, or The Globalists, or the Reptilian Agenda, or the British Crown, or whatever.
governments lie. the US has a history of lying to its people, as do the governemnts of all powerful nations. nazi germany being an extreme example, but definitely not the only one.
means, motive, and opportunity are always going to point the finger at the US government, perhaps some rogue faction of it anyway. there were generals that drew up a plan called 'operation northwoods' in the 60s using a nearly identical scenario to justify an invasion of the friendly neighbourhood boogeyman, communist cuba. there is precedent here.
add to that the crazy circumstance of a NORAD stand-down and air traffic control drills on the same day, plus hundreds of eyewitness reports on the day that dispute the official story, and we may have the mother of a conspiracy theories here.
obviously i can't say one way or the other, but there is a lot of wiggle room and a lot of circumstancial evidence and that means a lot of people are asking questions.
the only way to get rid of the widespread belief in government involvement is for people that back the official story to deal with it and tackle the questions head-on, point-for-point, which HAS NOT HAPPENED. every time a serious media pundit tackles it he/she attacks the accuser be it charlie sheen or whomever. those pundits never ever attack the points, like building seven.
penn and teller should realize that finding the most ridiculous of theorists and parading them for fun will add fuel to the fire here, especially when they advocate violence perpetrated on people that don't agree with them.
|