OMG I simply said that Smid wasn't a fantastic third pairing defensemen!!
I didn't say he was awful or not NHL worthy. I am simply of the opinion that many teams have similar types of guys that play third pairing and that Smid isn't "out of this world" in that role. I think he is adequate.
What is so offensive about having that opinion, and enjoying the use of non-standard stats to arrive at that opinion? Can't we agree to disagree that both sides have some basis for their opinion without immediately pulling the "troll" card?
|