View Single Post
Old 12-23-2013, 08:18 PM   #64
Fozzie_DeBear
Wucka Wocka Wacka
 
Fozzie_DeBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the Rockies, West of the Rest
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsmagic View Post
If the primary reasoning for this proposal is to eliminate 'tanking' as a coaching/management strategy then it is a solution for a non-existent problem in the NHL.

There is no evidence to support it. The fact that a large number of anonymous Internet bloggers assert that NHL teams 'tank' shows only a text book example of a cognitive bias known as an "availability cascade". By definition this bias is a self-reinforcing process in which a collective belief gains more and more plausibility through its increasing repetition in public discourse (or "repeat something long enough and it will become true"). Source: Wikipedia
Right...

However by giving better assets to less successful team you are incentivizing poor performance.

And any system that gives a bonus for suckage is questionable.

Because it will start to creep into peoples decision making at some level, at least by allowing an 'oh well at least we get a draft pick' attitude.
__________________
"WHAT HAVE WE EVER DONE TO DESERVE THIS??? WHAT IS WRONG WITH US????" -Oiler Fan

"It was a debacle of monumental proportions." -MacT

Last edited by Fozzie_DeBear; 12-23-2013 at 08:21 PM.
Fozzie_DeBear is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fozzie_DeBear For This Useful Post: