Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
From an SDM perspective wouldnt insuring the pharmicist is licensed with the governing body be enough to to say they werent negligent. They did what was required by law. What else should have SDM done presuming the pharmisist isnt the owner of the SDM
|
I'm not sure, I don't have the details of the case. And having a license has nothing to do with being negligent or not. You can't ignore negligence complaints because the Pharmacist is licensed. Anyone can be negligent. Did SDM know he was being negligent and did nothing to stop it? I'm not sure but let's pretend that was the case don't you think they should be held responsible?