Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
Didn't hear Duthachek and already commented on Mackenzie, but I have heard Friedman many times and he always says that is the perception and that he and his sources don't really know what goes on there.
He specifically said it was an attractive destination but that the new guy would want to be sure about the rumours before going there. Friedman has made it very specific that it is not facts coming from him but the perception.
Not sure about the other two reporters though as I haven't heard them discuss it.
|
If you're looking from statements of facts from a guy who maneuvers through innuendo and insider sources, you're going to be looking for awhile.
The only way he says he has facts about that is if he admits he has a source in the organization that is telling him those things, jeopardizing his source.
The major hockey media establishment have all commented on the involved nature of Flames ownership, from the Board of Governors, to the on ice product. Ken King signed Glencross to a contract on horseback while Feaster was the GM.
You have to be pretty creative at this point to come up with a semantical argument to the contrary.