So Big Ern scores a sweet goal on the same sequence of play where earlier the Canes ring one off of both goal posts. After the Big Ern goal, they go back to see if the Canes double-post was in. This drives me nuts.
Consider this:
What if the Big Ern goal was in overtime of game seven of the Stanley Cup finals, and it looks like we just won the cup. But they review the double post from earlier in the sequence and discover that the puck did in fact cross the line. Are they supposed to seriously say "um, yeah, sorry, but that double post goal was actually in so you do not, in fact, win the cup."
BLARGH!!!! If they want to video review a double-post then the play should be whistled dead immediately for said review. Else, if play is allowed to go on, no review should be allowed. Even if it did, in fact, go in.
Sorry, 2004 Flames.
