Quote:
Originally Posted by Beatle17
But the MOU in effect at the time had different wording than the final CBA.
|
You're right and I'm still confident that it wouldn't have been enforced against the Flames ("the player" is not the same thing as "a player", regardless of what the final CBA says), but it's inexcusable if they really hadn't analyzed that language before making the offer, as taxbuster claims. I've always been a Feaster supporter, but his firing is understandable if that's true.