Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
"Lies" is such a strong word. I prefer "truth-impaired utterances."
Seriously, though. Whether you believe Bush lied or not all depends on who knew what when. It's now quite clear that the administration was receiving extremely mixed signals at the very least--and I'll give you two examples of things that can in all probability be called "lies," if your definition (like mine) is "knowingly making a statement designed to misinform or mislead."
|
I realize what you're saying but still think that the government has information we don't have. They knew about certain things we still don't know about. Which is why the whole "no WMD found" arguement does not hold water for me.
I know I'm going to be labeled a Bush-lover for saying that, but to me I will give the government the benefit of the doubt until its term is over. Bush still has two years left, God knows what could happen.
When those two years are over and Iraq is still in the same situation it is now, then will I say Bush did not justify his war.
Funny that no one mentions Oil-for-Food......
