There's an article in the Times about Cheney's words in a town-hall style meeting. He apparently believes that recent reports proving that Iraq had no WMD's justifies the invasion of Iraq. His logic (apparently) is that because there were no WMD's, it was a good time to attack... cause they were going to be there soon.
Is it just me, or is the NYTimes a little more critical of Bush than supportive? They seem to run a lot more anti-administration pieces than those supporting Bush.
Also a surprising comment generally from Cheney, I personally thought he won the debate against Edwards. Why are Republican feet recently being jammed into Republican mouths?
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/A...artner=homepage