View Single Post
Old 12-09-2013, 12:59 PM   #29
Brannigans Law
First Line Centre
 
Brannigans Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Familia View Post
I was going to be that guy, but since you have a better idea, please explain to me why there had to be two lockouts in the last decade? What was the purpose and what did it accomplish for either side? I clearly understand that the cap is tied to revenue, and because of Sportsnet, revenue will be going up. I'll give it a few more years when players are at an average of $6 million each and the owners are crying again. I gurantee there will be another lockout at the conclusion of this deal. Must be nice to be rolling in the cash. This league makes me sick.
The point of the lock out is so that the players can ONLY have a certain % of the revenue. If we had no lock outs like the players wanted right now the average team and player salary would be spiraling out of control and teams would be going bankrupt.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2 View Post
Well, deal with it. I wasn't cheering for Canada either way. Nothing worse than arrogant Canadian fans. They'd be lucky to finish 4th. Quote me on that. They have a bad team and that is why I won't be cheering for them.
Brannigans Law is offline   Reply With Quote