Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan
The UN said there were no WMD? How the hell would they know? They didn't oversee the destruction of the entire arsenal as outlined by their own resolution(s). They had no idea. This baffles me to no end. Anti-Bushers will consistantly ignore the fact that there were documented WMD's that were unaccounted for at the time. Still are.
I wouldn't argue that the administration may have been hasty and trying to rush things but I'm not going to roll over on the lying bit. There's too much logic to say they didn't.
I shouldn't have used your shot at Hoz in my opening, I apologize. It's just I've seen a lot of generalizations regarding the intelligence of all Bush supporters (which I don't necessarily count myself among anymore) from certain posters on this site the last couple of days.
|
Well as the resident labelled "neo-con" do to my lack of opposition to this war I share your bafflement. There are good reasons to be opposed, minus Afghanistan where there is NO good reason, to the conflict as the Americans have been keystone cops-like and any improvements that have happened usually inspite of their good intensions.
The WMD/lying part is truly idiotic. Somehow being wrong has equated to lying. IF Bush and his warmongering-unilateralist-christian-neocon brain trusts went out of their way to LIE.....wouldn't thay have planted the evidence? It would have been soooooooo easy. I don't see too many answers for this.
But then these are people that trumpet an anti-semitic dingbat heckler.