Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
LOL. You tell me, Al.
|
The arguments in favor of this project aren't ROI/ridership based, but accessibility based. I.e. the SE portion of the green line is needed because service to the SE is currently below a minimum acceptable threshold, not because it's a cost-efficient area to develop. The NC portion of the line is different, as it serves a larger portion of the population and doesn't require major construction. (I'm assuming the NC part will not be built to LRT specs with this funding, only the SE. Bunk, can you confirm?)