Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
You said that King said it often that doesn't really seem like "such precise detail" to me.
Feaster said many times that he didn't have any mandate from ownership. He said many times that he saw the team as a competitive team and then after said that he misjudged the team.
Not sure why it is such precise detail and minutia to ask to see proof that he was lying in those instances especially when as you say King said it often.
|
From the King's statements, to all the other actions taken by the team, it has to be clear to anyone who follows the team as closely as you the the Flames organization didn't once drop the win now agenda (and therefore give Feaster the ability to make certain moves) until trade deadline last year. And therefore given the situation this team was in from assets and cap space, Feaster had little options to do much other than what he did. Not saying some of his moves of the more minor variety couldn't have been altered, but big picture, he didn't seem to have much choice to really alter anything significantly.
The point being is if you require some explicit statement from someone that spells out everything the way you suggest, then you are seemingly incapable of drawing reasonable conclusions from multiple pieces of evidence. Nothing in life works that way with the exception of burden of proof in a court room, but regular life requires you to make educated decisions based on less than explicit info. You don't seem to be able to do that (actually, truthfully I think you are, but you simply demand "beyond a shadow of a doubt" arguments to be made by those who have opinions that differ from yours, but that's just silliness you employ so you don't ever have to admit your wrong).