Quote:
Originally Posted by Stealth22
They've got a big order for B738's as well...wouldn't it make more sense to go either all A32X or all B73X? It would mean more commonality with regards to parts and training, wouldn't it?
Do they plan on adding more flights with A321's to meet demand?
I took a look at their schedule, and at least for JFK-LAX, all of their non-stop flights on that route are flown with 762's. You'd have to run the A321's more frequently.
My first thought was the A321 is too small in that config, and they should use something bigger. But their 762's only hold a total of 168 anyway. The A321 is probably cheaper to get as well compared to larger planes, and can always be re-purposed on other domestic routes.
|
So I deleted my reply somehow. Odd.
Quickly:
They'd want a fleet of A321s and 738s because of the vast quantity they ordered. AA is replacing their entire fleet (or close to it). By having orders for both aircraft they are speeding up delivery by half. It's only two different types of aircraft, at the size of the airline training and certification for two plane types isn't a big deal.
As for the configuration on the small aircraft (compared to 767s). AA seems to be making a decision that the money is in first and business class. So order the smallest aircraft that can do the transcontinental haul that meets their needs for 10 first, and 20 business class seats. Then fill the rest of the aircraft 50/50 premium economy and economy. Those seats would be gravy in terms of revenue and load factors.