View Single Post
Old 11-19-2013, 02:29 PM   #32
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuz View Post
Whether you like Torts or not, he brings up a very good point that things like this should be reviewable. I was watching the game with my wife and after they showed the replays I told her that the Canucks got the short end of the stick on that call. Why they can't review the play to get the right call when goaltender interference is in question is beyond me. Also, why can't they review a play if offside is suspected (like on the Duchene goal last season)? The NHL should be interested in ensuring the right call is made on all scoring plays.
2 reasons for not doing it.

1) Length and flow of game are paramount to keeping fans attention. Right now, this is the single biggest reason for so few reviewable plays

2) Reviewing judgement calls can lead to a many controversies as they eliminate. Somebody still has to make a call that many people week disagree with. It would have fixed the Vancouver goal, but many others would become more controversial.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote