Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2
No, but you can draw conclusions from previous arrests. I'm not about to have faith that a guy who has pulled a gun twice on people he supposedly cares about wouldn't hesitate to pull a gun on an unarmed teen he doesn't care about.
If you still believe this clown was innocent of killing Trayvon then nothing will make you believe he was guilty. He very well may be innocent but don't sit here and pretend these arrests don't paint him in a bad light regarding the murder trial.
|
I don't mean to put words in the good Captain's mouth, but he and I have seemed to have the same perspective on this case.
It's not that Zimmerman was innocent, he was not-guilty. The arguments for him being not-guilty work in a similar fashion for him being innocent. There is too much unknown, and conflicting evidence.
I'm not saying Zimmerman is innocent (I don't think I ever did) and I don't think Captain Crunch is saying Zimmerman is innocent, we're both saying he's not guilty.
The difference between Innocent and Not-Guilty is outlined above.