Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
It's a paradox of the NHL that business reasons stand in the way of improving the product on the ice. I don't think you could find anyone who would disagree that bigger ice surface and a shorter season would make for a much more entertaining game. But at this point, it's pretty clear that the actual product on the ice isn't the commercial draw of the sport. It's all about a pro jock culture serving as a backdrop for corporate schmoozing. Luxury box dining options and jersey sales matter more than excitement on the ice.
|
The bigger ice surface would not help anything as evidenced by watching European hockey games where its a trap bonanza and nothing happens for 90% of the game.