Quote:
Originally Posted by worth
I stand corrected, thanks.
Thinking about it, it is still a publicity thing in my mind. Does Iceberg really need to say anything and draw attention to a grainy photograph? They sell a product and people abuse it, everyone knows that. It just seems sort of obscure to me.
|
Well not a publicity grab so much, but publicity in the sense they are trying to protect their brand. Very common to try and get away from bad stories when your product is involved. The same way the councilors were trying to distance themselves from him before by making a show of not listening to him. Of course it's a political decision, but not necessarily in a selfish sense, they are just trying to show people they don't stand with him.