View Single Post
Old 11-12-2013, 11:35 AM   #51
Addick
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Addick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
Density and design matter, yes; but the cost increase argument is a fallacy. A simple one-vehicle Fire House instead of a full-blown Fire Hall reduces the cost of fire protection in a suburban community by millions, literally. A small community police station placed strategically in a large subdivision achieves the same goal within an 8 upa community or 16 upa community. More police and fire protection power is needed for higher-density areas just to mitigate the impact risks; this is common sense.
This strategy requires even more initial infrastructure costs and would have a more than questionable efficiency. Also, there would still be redundancies.

High-density areas do require additional stations but they get a much better rate of use (i.e. efficiency).


Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
These costs are either a burden or an investment, depending on who you ask. I consider them investments into the future well-being and wealth of the municipality.
What's the RoI and how long will it take to see a financial return?
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”

- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Addick is offline   Reply With Quote