Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Capgeek is well aware of the issue... the first paragraph on their front page is:
All 2013-14 numbers are estimates based on the best transaction information available. Averaged performance bonus amounts are completely rolled back, meaning teams potentially exceeding the bonus cushion (Boston, Edmonton, Colorado, Florida) may have less cap space than indicated. The maximum amount of long-term injury relief is also provided, meaning teams in LTI situations may have slightly less cap space than indicated. The "cap space" column indicates cap space available at season's end if today's roster remains unchanged, while AAV Today and AAV Deadline indicate potential cap space. Roll over the question marks in the table header for more information.
They also put stars and little ? mouseovers that say the cap space is not accurate if the team is over the bonus cushion.
|
Except they show Edmonton with millions of dollars of cap space when that isn't the case. Big discrepancy. In theory they have cap space. In theory. But in theory communism works.