Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
I read that quote and it tells us about zero on the Smid situation.
I think that the Feaster comments about them talking for 3 weeks prior to the deal and the Tencer comments indicate that the Smid trade was about Smid as a player and not them dumping him for salary concerns (especially since they didn't really have any) but if people think it was a salary dump that didn't have to do with Smid as a player they are free to think that.
|
Read the quote again...you said no GM would say they were going to trade X player (paraphrasing) in reference to the Smid/MacTavish situation. I am proving that you are wrong because the exact same GM you are talking about basically said that. So, yes it does tell you something about the Smid situation. Like others have said though, you seem to have problems admitting that you are wrong. So I am done.