Quote:
Originally Posted by GettinIggyWithIt
I was reading your response to my question so I didn't look at the reference to Dan Tencer from another response. This just confirms my assumption that this is based on pure speculation. I think "not definitive" is being way too kind.
Also, in reference to the bold, please read SureLoss' post - MacT basically did that when he spoke about Hemsky and Horcoff earlier in the year.
|
I read that quote and it tells us about zero on the Smid situation.
I think that the Feaster comments about them talking for 3 weeks prior to the deal and the Tencer comments indicate that the Smid trade was about Smid as a player and not them dumping him for salary concerns (especially since they didn't really have any) but if people think it was a salary dump that didn't have to do with Smid as a player they are free to think that.