It seems agreed it was a tie for the debate overall. Given this, do any of you subscribe to the theory that for Kerry a tie was as good as a win?
I mean afterall, according to Cheney he's much more experienced and fit for position, given that, John holding his own and at times getting on top, makes no sense. Surely with all that experience and wisdom (insidiousness, corruption) Cheney should have soundly triumphed...so, John does better?
|