Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
And Colborne it better. He's bigger, stronger on the puck, stands in front of the net and simply looks like a player that can have a bigger impact in the future. He's been unlucky in the past couple of games not to have two or three goals.
|
Again, I keep hearing that Colborne is stronger... he's not.
He has a big body. That's all. He doesn't use it to his advantage.
Physically, Colborne has the tools to be a good NHLer. But he doesn't have the hands, the IQ, and the defence of Backlund.
Colborne is a passive hockey player. He's at his best when you don't notice him.