View Single Post
Old 10-30-2013, 02:20 PM   #11
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude View Post
Way to paint this as rich communities fighting and tories pandering to their rich constituents. Get over yourselves.

So you're suggesting permanently removing a community's elementary school from that community? Would you advocate the same for your community? Or are you advocating for bulldozing all of Elbow Park?
Yes. Because that is objectively the right choice in this situation. The school is old, has been severely damaged, is on a floodplain, and a school 2km away. The distance between the schools is well under the provincially mandated 2.4km distance for providing out of area bus services.
http://www.cbe.ab.ca/transportation/faqs.asp

These schools are close enough that they service the same area.

If this wasn't a rich neighbourhood, the school would be closed already.

As to your first statement this is two rich communities fighting. And the Tories are pandering to a rich constituents. This is much more consideration (temporary gym) than a larger number of displaced students got in High River.

Last edited by bizaro86; 10-30-2013 at 02:23 PM.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote