View Single Post
Old 10-27-2013, 12:39 PM   #21
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
This notion of getting a high first rounder vs. low first rounder is hilarious. As if the team we trade with has the option where they would like their first round pick to land.
Well last year the Pitt pick was all but guaranteed to be lower than 24th, as they were contending for the presidents trophy and only a monumental collapse would have seen them miss the playoffs.


The St Louis pick was traded with a condition that if they missed the playoffs the pick turned into their 2014 pick. The pick was "lottery protected".

The Boston pick that was traded for Jagr also had a condition, and couldn't have been higher than 26th overall (it would have become a second rounder had they failed to win 2 playoff rounds)


So yes, GM's do try to control these things
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote