[Dion]

Originally Posted by Rerun

Its speculation unless you have proof otherwise. Do you have proof? No. Just a Toronto Star reporter's printed speculation

How can you trust Harper when dodges questions and refuses to give an straight answer?

As for Mr. Wright’s presence, the Prime Minister had at least four opportunities to acknowledge it.

Twice on June 4, Thomas Mulcair asked the Prime Minister who was present at that meeting. Neither question received a straight answer.

On June 5, Mr. Mulcair returned to the matter of the meeting and was more direct, asking Mr. Harper if Nigel Wright was present at the meeting.
The Prime Minister neither confirmed nor denied Mr. Wright’s presence.

On June 6, Mr. Mulcair tried again, asking the Prime Minister whether Nigel Wright had been present when Mr. Harper instructed Mr. Duffy to repay his expenses. The Prime Minister did not provide a straight answer in response.

http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/10/23/s...ry-13-meeting/

Or a PM who keeps changing the facts?

On June 5 in the House, Harper said: “Those were [Wright's] decisions. They were not communicated to me or to members of my office.”

“After firing Nigel Wright, the prime minister told Canadians in this House that absolutely no one else — not a few — no one else knew about the deal between Duffy and Wright. Now he admits that top Conservatives actually did know about the scheme,” Mulcair said.

If a “few” people knew of the plan, why didn’t Harper fire the others involved, Mulcair also asked.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/10...to-mike-duffy/