Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
He seems OK, but strikes me as kind of "out of it" for some reason. Like his campaign isn't well thought out and some of his ideas are just pretty far off the map. The problem is that Sorokoski (who has a lot of volunteer experience in the ward or around) basically has no policies or ideas. Its just so disheartening to see other wards with legitimate choices and options and us stuck with terrible representation for four more years.
|
I was quite shocked to see how empty Sorokoski's site was. It read like "Oh, people kept asking questions when I was door knocking! I better put some quick responses up!" There was so many "there are many things to deal with" endings to his answers that made it pretty irritating to read.
Frisch at least seems to be willing to be transparent and tries to make it clear he does not want to appear to be bought by developers. Anyway, regardless of if Frisch is a better candidate of not for my vote...I can't vote for DCU because she gets stuck on some things and never lets them go, to the point of hurting her image in the process. The manager overtime from the flood is a great example of something I think she never should have pushed. Why did she think this was okay to claw back the money? Why did she need the names of the managers who received overtime pay as specified in their contracts?
Also...why does she never answer emails when they are in opposition to subjects she supports?