View Single Post
Old 10-20-2013, 11:45 AM   #583
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indes View Post
On the flip side of that sending him down because we might have to pay him more 1 year earlier is just as ridiculous. Nothing to do with his contract status should have any impact on sending him down or keeping him up. It ends up being a pretty ridiculous argument either way.
As I said, there are plenty of reasons to keep him up (and that's what Im personally leaning towards). My point was that we should never be flippant about the salary cap....not taking it into consideration has potential to come back to bite us in the ass, like Sutter and his No-trade Clauses.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post: