View Single Post
Old 10-20-2013, 09:54 AM   #950
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
I wonder if it would be better to have public art seperate from infrastructure projects. It could be a revenue/cost-neutral change, but still create flexibility in how we spend the money.
I wish this would happen, We dont need art on roads other than some imprints into the overpasses (which are surprisingly more costly then you would think). So the any left over money after beautification things for railings, and retaining walls should be dumped into an art fund to fund bigger impact projects not tied to the original capital projects.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote