^It may well be and arguably should be. Rubecube was making the point earlier (well, in broader fashion) that attempting to fit aboriginal title into the rubric of Western property law based on a fee simple concept doesn't necessarily work. The whole point is that those concepts don't apply to first nations, whose interaction with land is historically totally different from the European notion of ownership for the purposes of cultivation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
Lots of a-holes who know jack about the history of aboriginal peoples or the context of these protests in this thread. I honestly love the denunciation of violence and the complete dismissal of 200 years of state sanctioned violence which went a few degrees further than some torched cruisers. Keep it up rednecks.
|
This is a joke, right? Or does denouncing present violence somehow tacitly condone previous violence suffered by the ancestors of those committing the present violence?
