Quote:
Originally Posted by Brannigans Law
Isn't this a simple case of you're free to religious freedom so long as it's not denying others their rights?
|
This, honestly, is one of those cases where you are going to infringe on someone's rights either way, so it becomes a case of choosing the lesser of two evils. Freedom of association is also a right, and one that this couple is likely to be denied because this case relates to their business rather than their person. And that is very likely the right way to read it in this case.
I have no idea how precedents work from one state court to another, but there have been very similar cases in other jurisdictions, and based on that, I expect this couple is going to lose.
e.g.:
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/8...ight-isnt.html