Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee
It sure doesn't look like they did the market research, because if they did, they wouldn't look like garbage. This is my point. Do you like them? 80% of this site doesn't. I guess maybe they could have done market research, yes it's plausible, but whoever collected that information or did that work looks to have failed. Again, see results of this poll.
You can take those criteria to Reebok and if they make an atrocity it doesn't mean you have to keep it. Not to mention a main criteria that fans would probably want to ditch is black, which is plastered all over it.
You know, just because the Flames do something doesn't mean you have to automatically like it, that's the fun part about freedom of thought. Is it fair to question how they got to these? I think so. Guess what, it's an opinion.
Meanwhile I'm not sure why teh other poster a couple posts back thinks that because they took away the retro, it means it's more likely to return as the full home / away set. Where's the logic in that? 3rds can be introduced as primaries too, or abandoned, or not, or whatever. So not following that logic whatsoever.
|
Like I said, I don't like them, but is it really shocking that 80% of us don't like something.
Nobody likes paperless tickets, nobody likes Rob Kerr, nobody likes that our new colour guy isn't an x player, nobody likes the new guys on the fan, nobody liked the old guys on the fan, nobody likes the horse jersey, no one likes the heritage classic jersey, no one likes that they canceled that last hour of Rome.......... If the Flames consulted us on anything, they'd never do anything because they'd paralyzed by fear.