Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lanny_MacDonald
Care to produce proof that indicates a plane hit the Pentagon? The 9/11 Commission Report failed to do so. They completely ignore the fact that no significant physical evidence could be produced to support the existance of commercial jet liner. They instead chose to go with the story that the jet was vaporized on impact. Ironic since they later said the people on the plane were identified by their fingerprints. So which is it? Their story makes no sense. A plane vaporizes on impact, consuming all metals (with melting points in excess of 2700 degrees) yet they were able to ID the victims through the use of fingerprints. The "official story" is impossible. Where is the wreckage? Where is the expansive destruction? If the plane landed short, where is the tell tale ground damage? If the plane went in clean as suggested, why is only the outer ring of the Pentagon significantly damaged? Also, how could a guy that could barely fly a cessna manage to pull of a maneuver that highly trained jet fighters struggle to do? Open your eyes. It doesn't add up. It never has.
|
Oh, and here's your wreckage that you say 'disappeared'
http://www.911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html
haha