Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan
Yeah, I do question it.
What would be the point of shooting down the plane when it is that close to the building? So close that the missile, in theory, penetrated two rings? I just don't buy it.
As for the general idea of the US scrambling F-16's to shoot down hijacked planes, I think that's exactly what they should've done. I don't get why people have a hard time with that course of action either.
As for the movie, it's kind of like "The Passion". I go to the movies to be entertained or to 'hear' a great story. "The Passion" was not entertaining and in fact it was depressing. I would imagine this is as well.
For the record, I didn't know they found wreckage a mile a way on Flight 93. The crash site looks a lot like the one in Colorado Springs several years ago. Nose dive straight into the ground, in tact. Doesn't really matter in the grand scheme.
|
I'm a little confused by what you're saying Dis. Are you saying that the flight that hit the Pentagon was shot down (there was no plane that hit the Pentagon, there wasn't enough damage nor wreckage to support this claim)? Your comment about the wreckage also seems strange, as the comment that it doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. It seems to me that we deserve the truth in this country, something that this administration does not really believe in revealing very often, under the guise of National Security. Since when did the truth not matter in the grand scheme?