Quote:
Originally Posted by WilderPegasus
Oh, I'm plenty capable of understanding pretty much any discussion about hockey. I understand what you're writing but I don't know if you do.
I did not make up anything you said. I just logically filled in the gaps of your vague statements.
Just because you can't come up with a logical argument doesn't mean that I'm making things up or arguing about things you've never said. You're a horrible poster. You hide behind vague language and illogical statements but nitpick irrelevant things.
Good for you. Based upon the source I'll give your opinion the consideration it deserves.
So you admit to trolling? Nice.
I've posted my thoughts on fighting multiple times in this thread. For someone who claims to have read my previous posts and is participating in this thread to not know how I feel about fighting that's pretty embarrassing.
You should probably read threads before you start participating in them.
Let me make this nice and simple for you. Step in any time you feel a made an incorrect statement.
You believe actual NHL players are the only ones who should decide on fighting in the game.
George Parros and Brian McGrattan are actual NHL players.
They are also enforcers.
Because they are enforcers it would be in their best interests to believe enforcers should be part of the game.
You are not an actual NHL player.
Your thoughts on enforcers not being part of the game is irrelevant because you are not an actual NHL player.
Ah yes. The old "I have a life and you don't" argument. Very solid argument there. Especially when I have averaged 2 posts a day on here and you've averaged 9 posts a day on here. Yes I'm the one without the life and you live a rich and fulfilling life of tv, video games and beer.
Nine posts a day. That's quite a bit for someone who's been here less than two months. Let me guess.... you've lurked here for years?
|
That's a mighty long response to something you deemed a "waste of time".
Keep arguing with yourself brother, you'll win or lose eventually.